The source for language control must be corrected but the task a huge one. The tech gods want to press on w/ all varieties of gender for their idea of the future. I wrote a detailed piece about this over a year ago. It needs to be updated. There are 2 groups controlling the interoperability standards across digital platforms HL-7 and SNOWMED. This is for electronic healthcare records but once in operating systems that spawn across fields and platforms. We still seem to be moving to a SDOH (social determinants model of health.) Within that are all sorts of things can be connected like SOGI data (sexual orientation and gender id). Insurance companies are in on it, colleges are mostly gender fluid across platforms, etc. Even if forms take off the gender id on intake forms, I suspect they will hide it under SDOH. https://margox.substack.com/p/technocratic-gender-harmony?r=1kuq0
Hi, I’m a FP subscriber and the best thing I can find for this seems to be their feedback link. They’ve done other articles on AI and on GAC (eg they reported - positively-on the Cass Review). So perhaps they would be receptive. If you’re not a subscriber (or don’t want to become one) I could send them a short teaser with a link to your article if you like.
I believe the issue is the data points pulled into the large language models (LLM). The data is wrong and corrupted. The source data must be corrected!
That was a lot of information, and I found it alarming and disturbing. How can we possibly fight AI - it is everywhere? I demand transparency and accountability, but from who? The programmers? The millionaires supporting AI? Look at Big Pharma manufacturing all these drugs for the trans kids and making more money! Don't forget about the therapists who now have full schedules because of the trans kids and are making more money. And of course, the mighty surgeons who are benefiting from the trans kids by willingly mutilating their healthy bodies and are making more money. Money talks, it has power, and AI is now the next big money maker. Sometimes I feel like we are indeed in the end times - how can this world continue ignoring the facts by pretending that the trans-cult is acceptable? Mere men are now playing god, and using AI to make decisions, and answer questions, only to manipulate the human race and further lie to us? We are in deep trouble here.
Yes, this AI is very insidious and dangerous because it only knows what it’s being programmed and it is not the truth. I also asked it questions like “can a man become a woman”, etc. and it’s all positive for transitioning. So sad and scary.
And I thought the social media algorithms were bad because of the brainwashing and conditioning. This is going to be so, so much worse. So many doctors and nurses are going to be relying on the information coming from AI—not good.
Fantastic idea— to expose AI’s initial biased response and get it to own up and correct its errors. AND to start a petition. Please try to get this published in an outlet like The Free Press.
WOW. I'm impressed with what you did there, calling it out, and potentially getting it to give a different answer to the next person. This technology is dangerous. NYTimes had an article just today about how it led to a boy's suicide.
Unfortunately, my challenge to its reply will only change the way it answers me. It learns what we want from it by how we interact with it, so if I wanted more discredited research and more propaganda promoting these false ideas, that’s what it would give me. And that’s exactly how it misleads children into self harm.
It also leads some into believing it is a god or a tool of divination, and as a result it is creating “chosen one” delusions in some of its users. Unless we call these things out and force those behind the curtain to change the way AI replies, this is going to accelerate not only identity confusion, by mass mental illness.
Truth harder to find, not easier with AI at least on this issue. This was like a cross examination. AI needs to have the best interests of humans in mind such as long productive lives, strong health, marriage and children among others.
This is SO important. The rapid use of AI is outpacing any ethical guidelines & must catch up. I have had ‘arguments’ a lot with ai on this issue & their use of gendered language that clearly shows bias. The different models have their own personalities. I put the same question you asked to Grok & fortunately it was very different & cited negative effects post surgery, studies that show higher suicide rates. My skepticism is that it wants to be my friend…did it answer based on my previous conversations? Let’s see if you asked the same question now to ChatGPT how would it respond? Did it ‘learn’ or will it pander to your preference? If someone else were to ask the same question what would it say?
I erased my conversations with Grok. And sure enough it has reverted back. I asked about the use of estrogen in males & it was all positive & cited yet again WPATH & the Endocrine Society as well established credible sources. It wasn’t until I uploaded articles, papers & links did it revise its answer. You can do thumbs down or provide feedback…but is it really listening. Thank you to the authors for putting this petition together
Will do then!
Fascinating.
The source for language control must be corrected but the task a huge one. The tech gods want to press on w/ all varieties of gender for their idea of the future. I wrote a detailed piece about this over a year ago. It needs to be updated. There are 2 groups controlling the interoperability standards across digital platforms HL-7 and SNOWMED. This is for electronic healthcare records but once in operating systems that spawn across fields and platforms. We still seem to be moving to a SDOH (social determinants model of health.) Within that are all sorts of things can be connected like SOGI data (sexual orientation and gender id). Insurance companies are in on it, colleges are mostly gender fluid across platforms, etc. Even if forms take off the gender id on intake forms, I suspect they will hide it under SDOH. https://margox.substack.com/p/technocratic-gender-harmony?r=1kuq0
Hi, I’m a FP subscriber and the best thing I can find for this seems to be their feedback link. They’ve done other articles on AI and on GAC (eg they reported - positively-on the Cass Review). So perhaps they would be receptive. If you’re not a subscriber (or don’t want to become one) I could send them a short teaser with a link to your article if you like.
Please do!
I believe the issue is the data points pulled into the large language models (LLM). The data is wrong and corrupted. The source data must be corrected!
That the data is corrupted is correct! see above comment
That was a lot of information, and I found it alarming and disturbing. How can we possibly fight AI - it is everywhere? I demand transparency and accountability, but from who? The programmers? The millionaires supporting AI? Look at Big Pharma manufacturing all these drugs for the trans kids and making more money! Don't forget about the therapists who now have full schedules because of the trans kids and are making more money. And of course, the mighty surgeons who are benefiting from the trans kids by willingly mutilating their healthy bodies and are making more money. Money talks, it has power, and AI is now the next big money maker. Sometimes I feel like we are indeed in the end times - how can this world continue ignoring the facts by pretending that the trans-cult is acceptable? Mere men are now playing god, and using AI to make decisions, and answer questions, only to manipulate the human race and further lie to us? We are in deep trouble here.
Yes, this AI is very insidious and dangerous because it only knows what it’s being programmed and it is not the truth. I also asked it questions like “can a man become a woman”, etc. and it’s all positive for transitioning. So sad and scary.
And I thought the social media algorithms were bad because of the brainwashing and conditioning. This is going to be so, so much worse. So many doctors and nurses are going to be relying on the information coming from AI—not good.
I signed and chipped in. Thank you for doing it!
Fantastic idea— to expose AI’s initial biased response and get it to own up and correct its errors. AND to start a petition. Please try to get this published in an outlet like The Free Press.
I messaged them on Instagram. Thank you for the suggestion!!
WOW. I'm impressed with what you did there, calling it out, and potentially getting it to give a different answer to the next person. This technology is dangerous. NYTimes had an article just today about how it led to a boy's suicide.
Unfortunately, my challenge to its reply will only change the way it answers me. It learns what we want from it by how we interact with it, so if I wanted more discredited research and more propaganda promoting these false ideas, that’s what it would give me. And that’s exactly how it misleads children into self harm.
It also leads some into believing it is a god or a tool of divination, and as a result it is creating “chosen one” delusions in some of its users. Unless we call these things out and force those behind the curtain to change the way AI replies, this is going to accelerate not only identity confusion, by mass mental illness.
Thank you thank you thank you!!! This is hugely important work. Signed and passed on.
A related story of AI harm: https://www.today.com/video/parents-sue-openai-alleging-chatgpt-assisted-son-s-suicide-245776453698
Don’t forget to sign the petition, and share it with anyone else who might. The goal is to gather 1000 signatures, and we have a long way to go!
Truth harder to find, not easier with AI at least on this issue. This was like a cross examination. AI needs to have the best interests of humans in mind such as long productive lives, strong health, marriage and children among others.
This is SO important. The rapid use of AI is outpacing any ethical guidelines & must catch up. I have had ‘arguments’ a lot with ai on this issue & their use of gendered language that clearly shows bias. The different models have their own personalities. I put the same question you asked to Grok & fortunately it was very different & cited negative effects post surgery, studies that show higher suicide rates. My skepticism is that it wants to be my friend…did it answer based on my previous conversations? Let’s see if you asked the same question now to ChatGPT how would it respond? Did it ‘learn’ or will it pander to your preference? If someone else were to ask the same question what would it say?
I know a company and individual who programs AI with this sort of stuff.
I erased my conversations with Grok. And sure enough it has reverted back. I asked about the use of estrogen in males & it was all positive & cited yet again WPATH & the Endocrine Society as well established credible sources. It wasn’t until I uploaded articles, papers & links did it revise its answer. You can do thumbs down or provide feedback…but is it really listening. Thank you to the authors for putting this petition together
And we need to investigate the companies and individuals who do the programming. I can point the way to one company...
..they exist? Moderators?
Individuals program AI with their ideological agendas.
Excellent. Thank you for all the hard work it took to know all of the facts and to put all of this together.