To second Glenna Goldis's comment. The only flags that should be on display in public schools, government building, community public spaces should be the American Flag, State Flag, and local city government flag. The rainbow flag does not belong in a public school. It is a form of private expression.
What can’t gay men or women do that straight men & women can? There is no systemic discrimination against gay people. You cannot force everyone to accept the gay lifestyle. That’s it. Rainbow was a covenant between God and men. I am offended to see it represents a lifestyle that not approved by the Lord.
The flags should go away and never come back. The rainbow represents God's promise to the world that He will never destroy the earth again with water. Today, after a rainstorm when the sun is shining again, and a beautiful arched bow of colored hues can be seen - it is beautiful. But the trans ideology has ruined that beautiful rainbow and now I cringe whenever I see a rainbow - yes, even the one in the sky after a shower. My dear friend just lost her 10-year-old dog, and I bought her a sympathy card, but I made sure I did not reference the "rainbow bridge" because she has a son who believes he is trans. Mentioning the rainbow bridge to her would only have added more grief to her world because she is terrified that she will lose her son to this trans-cult. Rainbows can be found everywhere now and, in every store on children's clothing, toys, books, stickers, cards, backpacks, hair clips - it is a subtle way of influencing their young innocent minds. Children are growing up being conditioned to see any and all rainbow symbols and flags as something good. What was once something beautiful is now void of beauty and only causes pain. We know the truth about the trans lies. I support the removal of these flags and colors on our streets and sidewalks. Stop the conditioning! It is not acceptable to harm children. You wrote "It is insane to prescribe serious sex change drugs with the potential of intense side effects without consideration of underlying mental health conditions." Yes, it is insane and why people can't see this is so baffling to me. As a society, our voices need to be heard, and perhaps by starting to erase some of the trans-cult's messages on our streets and sidewalks, it will help send a message loud and clear: Enough is Enough! Stop harming our children. I hope the TQ is permanently removed from the LGB alphabet because being gay is not a crime or anything to be ashamed of, and a gay person is not forced to take harmful drugs and have surgery. You cannot help who you love. But the TQ agenda is very sinister and dark and evil as it plays into the hands of Big Pharma. Maybe one day the beautiful rainbow symbol will be restored to its true meaning - a promise, God's promise. And maybe one day, our children will just be children again.
I feel the need to say that when all is exposed about Obama, his administrative and executive orders will be nullified, and I say that with confidence. As I'm sure we can all see there is a LOT happening in our country and around the world. Things will be very different by this time next year (and much sooner actually I believe!). It just amazes me what all we have been through....all of us who have gone through this with our children, but the days ahead are going to be SO much better.
Industry has long been hiding in the LGB agenda. History is important and understanding how the NGOs born in the age of AIDS/ HIV were by largely partnered with and reliant upon Pharma funding is key. NGOs numbered in the many hundreds in the era of AIDS, medical programs were built, foundations were established, lobbying efforts, etc. To say the AIDS agenda is built on accurate science would be difficult at best. See Rethinking AIDS website, read Celia Farber's Real Adverse Events, or Jon Rappoport's AIDS Inc to get an idea. HRC started in 1980 established their foundation in '84. HRC has always been about incrementalism adding letters and industry initiatives as they went. By the mid- late 90s' efforts were introduced to include 'T' in its agenda. Bilek and Kotkin are correct in the industry direction towards a transhuman future. Inclusive initiatives are strongly tied to the 'family creation' industry.
I think/hope we are soon to see the truth about all these things, the NGOs, the AIDS/HIV agenda, Big Pharma's involvement, the military industrial complex's involvement, of course the government's involvement etc.. The picture is huge but I firmly believe that the truth will come out about all of it and those that want to know can know. It's an extremely complex situation and I certainly don't pretend to understand it all but what I do know is there are some really wicked people (if you can even call them people) behind it all! :(
Agree. Also, people always focus on what President Eisenhower said about our industrial-military complex in his speech when he left office but there was more:
"Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite."
Yes. Every one should by now be aware of that but sadly too many are caught up in narratives (like rainbow initiatives). If you do not follow the work of Patrick Wood at Technocracy News, I recommend it.
Controlling all via the technocratic elite is what the agenda is about.
No, it should go. It has outlived its usefulness. It no longer has anything to do with me, a lifelong lesbian (age 73, came out at age 19).
Do not attempt to force-team lesbians and gay men into a phony alliance designed to put more money in the pockets of the Human Rights Campaign.
Nope. Male rapists "identifying" as women, then given a cell in a women's prison, has nothing to do with women's rights. Quite the opposite, in fact.
A "movement" that lies to children and adults about the nature of human physiology and sexuality, sterilizes and maims the bodies of future homosexuals -- the ones most likely to experience gender dysphoria as children -- and turns women's rights into a sick joke, is not the kind of "movement" this lesbian is interested in.
You're right. Once upon a time, that Rainbow flag was meaningful. I remember its introduction into the gay activist world and it was fine by me. I marched in the second Christopher Street Liberation Day Parade in Greenwich Village. I marched for the right of gays and lesbians to get married and serve in the military. I was out there doing the "work." I'm still doing it.
What I'm not doing now is endorsing a barbaric, anti-science, anti-gay, anti-child and anti-woman "movement" that calls me a homophobe because I'm not interested in giving oral sex to a dude in a dress.
Gay men like actual men, for all the reasons that gay men like men. And lesbians like actual women. We are so darn homophobic! What are ya gonna do?
To second Glenna Goldis's comment. The only flags that should be on display in public schools, government building, community public spaces should be the American Flag, State Flag, and local city government flag. The rainbow flag does not belong in a public school. It is a form of private expression.
Many "LGBT without the T" gays support the rainbow flag but only as a form of private expression, not forced on the public by government
What can’t gay men or women do that straight men & women can? There is no systemic discrimination against gay people. You cannot force everyone to accept the gay lifestyle. That’s it. Rainbow was a covenant between God and men. I am offended to see it represents a lifestyle that not approved by the Lord.
The flags should go away and never come back. The rainbow represents God's promise to the world that He will never destroy the earth again with water. Today, after a rainstorm when the sun is shining again, and a beautiful arched bow of colored hues can be seen - it is beautiful. But the trans ideology has ruined that beautiful rainbow and now I cringe whenever I see a rainbow - yes, even the one in the sky after a shower. My dear friend just lost her 10-year-old dog, and I bought her a sympathy card, but I made sure I did not reference the "rainbow bridge" because she has a son who believes he is trans. Mentioning the rainbow bridge to her would only have added more grief to her world because she is terrified that she will lose her son to this trans-cult. Rainbows can be found everywhere now and, in every store on children's clothing, toys, books, stickers, cards, backpacks, hair clips - it is a subtle way of influencing their young innocent minds. Children are growing up being conditioned to see any and all rainbow symbols and flags as something good. What was once something beautiful is now void of beauty and only causes pain. We know the truth about the trans lies. I support the removal of these flags and colors on our streets and sidewalks. Stop the conditioning! It is not acceptable to harm children. You wrote "It is insane to prescribe serious sex change drugs with the potential of intense side effects without consideration of underlying mental health conditions." Yes, it is insane and why people can't see this is so baffling to me. As a society, our voices need to be heard, and perhaps by starting to erase some of the trans-cult's messages on our streets and sidewalks, it will help send a message loud and clear: Enough is Enough! Stop harming our children. I hope the TQ is permanently removed from the LGB alphabet because being gay is not a crime or anything to be ashamed of, and a gay person is not forced to take harmful drugs and have surgery. You cannot help who you love. But the TQ agenda is very sinister and dark and evil as it plays into the hands of Big Pharma. Maybe one day the beautiful rainbow symbol will be restored to its true meaning - a promise, God's promise. And maybe one day, our children will just be children again.
I feel the need to say that when all is exposed about Obama, his administrative and executive orders will be nullified, and I say that with confidence. As I'm sure we can all see there is a LOT happening in our country and around the world. Things will be very different by this time next year (and much sooner actually I believe!). It just amazes me what all we have been through....all of us who have gone through this with our children, but the days ahead are going to be SO much better.
I hope you are right.
The flags should go. It has hijacked the rainbow from all other meanings. The symbolism needs to be dismantled.
Industry has long been hiding in the LGB agenda. History is important and understanding how the NGOs born in the age of AIDS/ HIV were by largely partnered with and reliant upon Pharma funding is key. NGOs numbered in the many hundreds in the era of AIDS, medical programs were built, foundations were established, lobbying efforts, etc. To say the AIDS agenda is built on accurate science would be difficult at best. See Rethinking AIDS website, read Celia Farber's Real Adverse Events, or Jon Rappoport's AIDS Inc to get an idea. HRC started in 1980 established their foundation in '84. HRC has always been about incrementalism adding letters and industry initiatives as they went. By the mid- late 90s' efforts were introduced to include 'T' in its agenda. Bilek and Kotkin are correct in the industry direction towards a transhuman future. Inclusive initiatives are strongly tied to the 'family creation' industry.
on HRC (also on Bilek's blog): https://margox.substack.com/p/a-campaign-like-no-other
on 'family creation': https://margox.substack.com/p/legally-trans
I think/hope we are soon to see the truth about all these things, the NGOs, the AIDS/HIV agenda, Big Pharma's involvement, the military industrial complex's involvement, of course the government's involvement etc.. The picture is huge but I firmly believe that the truth will come out about all of it and those that want to know can know. It's an extremely complex situation and I certainly don't pretend to understand it all but what I do know is there are some really wicked people (if you can even call them people) behind it all! :(
Agree. Also, people always focus on what President Eisenhower said about our industrial-military complex in his speech when he left office but there was more:
"Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite."
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/president-dwight-d-eisenhowers-farewell-address
Yup.
Yes. Every one should by now be aware of that but sadly too many are caught up in narratives (like rainbow initiatives). If you do not follow the work of Patrick Wood at Technocracy News, I recommend it.
Controlling all via the technocratic elite is what the agenda is about.
https://www.technocracy.news/
I don't know him and will take a look. Thanks.
I find it odd that schools in my district fly rainbow flags along with the US and state flags.
What next?
what city/state?
Burn every rainbow flag. Every single one, without exception.
Try it.
I'll take that challenge any day.
The number and reasons for all these flags is beyond ridiculous.
I want the rainbow back. It should not be a symbol of sexual perversion.
IMO,
The Rainbow belongs to God. It always has & always will.
It shouldn’t be a symbol for any other cause.
Rainbow crosswalks pose a danger to service dogs and the people who rely on them. Not inclusive at all.
No, it should go. It has outlived its usefulness. It no longer has anything to do with me, a lifelong lesbian (age 73, came out at age 19).
Do not attempt to force-team lesbians and gay men into a phony alliance designed to put more money in the pockets of the Human Rights Campaign.
Nope. Male rapists "identifying" as women, then given a cell in a women's prison, has nothing to do with women's rights. Quite the opposite, in fact.
A "movement" that lies to children and adults about the nature of human physiology and sexuality, sterilizes and maims the bodies of future homosexuals -- the ones most likely to experience gender dysphoria as children -- and turns women's rights into a sick joke, is not the kind of "movement" this lesbian is interested in.
You're right. Once upon a time, that Rainbow flag was meaningful. I remember its introduction into the gay activist world and it was fine by me. I marched in the second Christopher Street Liberation Day Parade in Greenwich Village. I marched for the right of gays and lesbians to get married and serve in the military. I was out there doing the "work." I'm still doing it.
What I'm not doing now is endorsing a barbaric, anti-science, anti-gay, anti-child and anti-woman "movement" that calls me a homophobe because I'm not interested in giving oral sex to a dude in a dress.
Gay men like actual men, for all the reasons that gay men like men. And lesbians like actual women. We are so darn homophobic! What are ya gonna do?
Signed, Ms. Lesbian Homophobe
You sound homophilic, in that you like women as a woman. That is homophilia.