On October 6th, I listened to Melissa Block on NPR report that “Courts have blocked a number of the anti-LGBTQ laws from going into effect” and, as usual with NPR’s reporting on this issue, my blood began to boil. From start to finish, the gender ideology movement turns language upside down and NPR, amongst many others, including journalists, is fully participating in the lies to support the trans movement’s agenda. In order to win and save our children we must retake language. I will start.
These “anti-LGBTQ” laws discussed in Block’s broadcasst are not laws enacted to be “anti” anyone or their “rights” as these LGBTQWTF fanatics insist—but to protect children like ours. These laws, which are a good start, are more accurately described as “anti-Radical Gender Theory.” And, let's be clear, the RGT agenda is evil. If you still think that the RGT or LGBTQ Agenda™ has anything to do with Gay Rights, please put that out of your mind right now. This is the first place where words are corrupted. Many of the people behind this movement are not even gay, but fetishist hetero men or women and men who suffer from personality disorders. The T is really just a cover for radical gender theory, a movement that many LGBs reject. It doesn’t even protect homosexual boys and men. Andrew Sullivan rejected it years ago when he said that trans threatens gay people young and old. Why does NPR not interview the LGB Alliance? They lost the T, so should we. Or, why doesn’t NPR interview Gays Against Groomers? That was rhetorical because I know why—these groups get silenced, not featured. The media is one of the many institutions which have been co-opted and corrupted by this nefarious movement.
The NPR interviewer, Melissa Block, begins: “This week Oklahoma became the latest state to enact a law that targets gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth.” Doesn’t that sound so cruel—to “target” something wholesome like “medical care”? Doesn’t “gender-affirming” sound lovely and positive? But, this movement more closely resembles the social contagion that was the Salem Witch Trials, in the manner in which it has swept our society, as well as the degree to which those who promote it insist they are on the side of good—even as vulnerable children are harmed.
Ann Miller with the LGBTQ Agenda™ advocacy group PFLAG (a group founded to support lesbians and gays) lamented that outlawing sterilizing drugs and operations on children “puts a terrible pressure on both the family and, honestly, our most vulnerable population, which is transgender youth.” Ann, you’re lying. You’ve got it upside-down. Families are under terrible pressure from the LGBTQ Agenda™. Ask parents here. Read our testimonials.
There is no such thing as “transgender youth.” They do not exist. No more than unicorns. We must stop this myth perpetuated in the media about “trans youth.” These are confused boys and girls. But these children are indeed our most vulnerable population, that is true. They are vulnerable to groomers and butchers. They are vulnerable to you. This is precisely why we must protect them. They cannot possibly make decisions about their future fertility and happiness. It is a crime against humanity to take that away from their future selves. Really, it is a Nuremberg level crime.
We need to ask more questions, since the “journalists” do not:
When did the ACLU fail us? In the NPR interview Gillian Branstetter, an MtF “formerly of the National Women’s Law Center” now at the American Civil Liberties Union, “which has challenged many of those laws in court” says the results are encouraging, that “judges have really read these bills for filth. They are openly discriminatory.” When did the ACLU decide to go big on child mutilation?
When did groups designed to help gay youth like the Trevor Project turn full-on groomer?
Where is this “science”? Sasha Buchert (MtF) at Lambda Legal says in the NPR interview that s/he's “heartened by judges who've considered these cases and have sided with science rather than stigma.” These people are good with their snappy slogans. As PITT readers know, outside of the US “transgender science” is collapsing in lawsuits and health-ministry retreats.
When did our teachers/schools/teacher unions forget that alienating children from their parents is bad, not good? That it’s what groomers do? See: “What is Child Grooming? How Can Parents Protect Their Kids?” How do they not understand that this is much like Maoist brainwashing? Are they not aware of cognitive dissonance theory? See: Steven Hassan’s BITE model dissertation on cult techniques.
Listen to the NPR interview. Listen to the MtFs. The ex-Marine especially. Yeah, listen to “her” voice. NPR is participating in the delusion of men wearing “woman face.” As a first step, journalists like Melissa Block should simply stop lying. Stop participating in the twisting of language. “She”? No. “He.” A wig, long hair, a dress—these do not a woman make.
This movement must be stopped. And, the first step is to take back language.
This may be just informative or redundant but it is critical to me. This describes my nearly seven decades of striving with gender dysphoria and my current conclusions. I am so ashamed that it's taken so long to reach these decisions, but this is part of my current identity foundation from which to proceed. Of course, you can assess this as you will.
Eight historical transliterated Hebrew biological sex designations with terse definitions:
Zachar, male.
Nekevah, female.
Androgynos, having both male and female characteristics.
Tumtum, lacking sexual characteristics.
Aylonit hamah, identified female at birth but later naturally developing male characteristics.
Aylonit adam, identified female at birth but later developing male characteristics through human intervention.
Saris hamah, identified male at birth but later naturally developing female characteristics.
Saris adam, identified male at birth and later developing female characteristics through human intervention.
Sex Difference in Christian Theology: Male, Female, and Intersex in the Image of God
by Megan K. DeFranza
This book is a wonderful, merciful, rigorous theological discussion of biological sex and a correlative video is listed here:
https://youtu.be/331smwhg0gM
Please forgive me if this story is considered inappropriate within this context? Whether anyone considers themselves christian or not, may I please include some extra nuance to your conversation? I have no intention of attempting any kind of evangelization in my contribution, I would however like to supply some extra dimension to the discourse. To advance some concepts I would like to present some quotes.
First:
Isa 56:4-5 KJV 4 For thus saith the LORD unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, and choose the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant; 5 Even unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name, that shall not be cut off.
Second:
Mat 19:11-12 KJV 11 But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given. 12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.
Third:
Act 8:26-40 KJV (The baptism of the eunuch which I consider too long to be quoted here but far from inconsequential.)
I would love to note first that the term eunuch in these quotes seems to be defined by the Lord Jesus himself to include intersex individuals (eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb). Unwilling (some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men) and willing individuals (eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs) appear similarly defined.
May I also note the quote (unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters). I am aware that original Hebrew literally is translated "a hand and a name" greater than of sons and of daughters. I am, however, quite intrigued by the implications that eunuchs are given recognition separate from sons and from daughters.
I consider myself to be trans (eunuch, saris adam, barren (Isa 54:1-17)). I am not exactly a son and not exactly a daughter. I have a woefully masculine face and physique but I am definitely not a son (AMAB MTF post SRS (GRS)). Therefore I do not fit in sons' spaces or daughters' spaces.
I have immersed myself in the historical, philosophical, psychological, political and theological literature and media for a significant portion of seven decades and conclude that I am physically, politically, perceptually and theologically non-binary. Psychologically, I have identified as female since the age of two or three but diligent discipline discouraged any hint or discussion of my feminine identity or behavior. My ideal puberty would have included hormone blockers until a legally acceptable age to begin HRT and GRS (SRS) and then as nearly normal womanhood as attainable.
In actuality, the diligent discipline has induced my voluntary celibacy and perception that I have been insidiously gaslighted and have a subtle incidence of complex traumatic stress disorder by the dismissing, ignoring, denying and suppressing of my gender identity. I am just one of my peers who is the quarry for metaphorical, euphemistic and literal physical erasure. My concern is not just psychological, health or culture. This is the challenge and analysis of my right to true Judeo-Christian observance and Judeo-Christian expression and Judeo-Christian faith.
I hope my comments and the quotes are discovered to be beneficial. I pray that nothing is found to be triggering because my intent was to be somehow loving, compassionate and empathetic to each and everyone. If you have deigned to read this entire comment, thank you much!
Here is a "do-gooder" predator for you:
https://thepostmillennial.com/prominent-new-york-trans-activist-arrested-charged-with-soliciting-sex-from-minor?utm_campaign=64487