Too Much Coincidence Usually Means Planning
For some time now, this agenda has been spreading around the world. It appears in different countries, different cultures, different contexts, but almost always with the same discourse, the same phrases, the same ready-made answers, and the same narrative about origin, cause, and solution. At some point, doubt naturally arises. Too much coincidence stops being coincidence. Too much coincidence usually means planning.
These things do not arise out of nowhere when there is a single narrative, mass adherence, and zero room for questioning. Questioning begins to be treated as something forbidden, almost immoral.
It is hard not to find it strange when teachers, doctors, psychologists, and institutions begin repeating the same script. When everyone answers the same way, using the same words and the same arguments, the question becomes inevitable: where is this playbook? Discord? Closed groups? The dark web? Colleges? Schools? We may not know exactly where it is, but it is evident that there is a shared orientation.
What also draws attention is the existence of a very clear step-by-step process. The standard answer to “why this is happening,” the narrative of when it began, the ready-made discourse offered by professionals, and the anger almost always directed at the family, at parents, at any form of boundaries. None of this feels spontaneous.
Telling a father or a mother, “would you rather have a dead son or a living daughter,” is not care. It is emotional blackmail. It is psychological terror. It is a way to silence any honest reflection through fear.
The result is a generation being emotionally weakened: men being taught to reject masculinity, women encouraged to deny femininity, religions being ridiculed, the family portrayed as oppressive, and parents who guide, shape, and prepare their children for the world being labeled as toxic villains.
Years ago, if someone looked in the mirror believing their internal conflicts would be resolved by changing sex, this would have been treated as a mental health disorder. When and why did that change? Why did this suddenly become affirmation, with authorization for sex-change surgery in a matter of minutes, as reported by countless individuals who later chose to detransition?
Denying this discussion is not science. It is a clear imposition.
To parents and families, pay careful attention: questioning is not hatred. No one knows a child better than their own parents. On the contrary, love is not simply affirming everything. Love is questioning, especially when something does not seem right, because those who love care, those who love protect, and those who love ask questions precisely because of the love they feel for that person.


Yeah for sure, but its well known to be a coordinated psy-op.
I assume PITT has read this: https://spectator.com/article/the-document-that-reveals-the-remarkable-tactics-of-trans-lobbyists/
If not, please get up to speed on the infamous Denton's Document.
I don’t agree that rejecting religion is necessarily part of the problem.
Transgenderism is itself clearly a religion. Jesus rose from the dead. A man can become a woman. Both are examples of a kind of magical thinking protected in the US by the First Amendment as is my belief as an atheist that they are religious nonsense.