7 Comments
User's avatar
slow it down's avatar

Was this actually sent to legislators?

Expand full comment
BL's avatar

Yes - this has been modified to be general for any legislator. The original was specific to state and bill under consideration.

Expand full comment
Midwest Molly's avatar

Can I use some of the language here? I am writing a letter to the big Children's hospital near me.

Expand full comment
Elisabeth K.'s avatar

I disagree with this. As we've seen in the abortion fight, legislatures make lousy doctors. There's always some weird edge case where a law or regulation blocks someone from getting the care they need. I think puberty blockers should be very, very rare, but I don't want to take options away from physicians.

Expand full comment
BL's avatar

Depends on how you define care. Therapy is a viable medical treatment for gender dysphoric children. Puberty blockers used off label with NO evidence of benefit over risk in stopping normal puberty is NOT healthcare.

Expand full comment
slow it down's avatar

I do agree. The new California bill is one example of a law gone the wrong, albeit the other way. Parents should be informed. Healthcare should cover this for adults who need this care.

Expand full comment
CJS's avatar

Another great article. Thank you.

Expand full comment