Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Interested Party's avatar

Yes I am a doctor. I noticed the I for intersex being inserted into the alphabet soup of LGBTQIA+ a few years ago and thought it strange. Intersex conditions are rare, and have nothing whatsoever in common with the modern idea of "trans". The idea is totally incoherent - are the activists really saying that all people who are "trans" or "non-binary" have some sort of chromosomal abnormality? That would be easily disproved.

To be honest, everything in that series of letters after LGB is questionable. "T" is trans, which I believe is 100% socially created and 0% inherent and in any case has nothing in common with being same-sex attracted; Q is either Queer which either seems to cover autistic girls who close platonic friendships with one other similar same-sex person, or to be a synonym for Gay for people who don't want to use Gay (why?) or it means Questioning, which is really not an identity group at all; I is intersex, which is a medical condition having nothing in common with anything above; A is Allies (all those along for the ride), and + is for anyone we missed out who isn't the dreaded "basic" straight "cis" person. So much narcissism I'm wondering if the whole alphabet will be used in the end. Of course M for MAPS is around the corner...

Expand full comment
Frederick R Prete's avatar

Thank you so much for this essay. As a Biological Psychologist, I will tell you that you are absolutely correct. Genetic anomalies (such as aneuploidies, too few or too many chromosomes) are not indicative of different "sexes." I made this point very clear in the essay "If Aneuploidies = Sexes, Then Two-Headed Turtles Aren’t Turtles"… You may be interested in it.

https://everythingisbiology.substack.com/p/if-aneuploidies-sexes-then-two-headed

I also want to point out that there are a number of DSD's that are caused by reasons other than genetic aneuploidies. Anyone who uses aneuploidies or DSD's to bolster their political/social agenda knows nothing about biology, and (in my opinion) is being both cruel and exploitive. People are not tools to be used for one's own selfish ends. Each of us should be treated with the dignity and respect that we deserve as people. This is especially important for those of us who may have some biological challenges with which to deal.

I think we actually have to start being honest — and quite bold — in our language (as you have been). As a scientist, I've no problem telling someone that if they think aneuploidies or DSD's represent different sexes, they are *absolutely* wrong and need to "educate" themselves.

Thank you for your bold and thought-provoking essay. I wish the best for you and your family!

Sincerely,

Frederick

Expand full comment
114 more comments...

No posts