Great article. Every point about how debating transgender medical care is nearly impossible can also be said about many aspects of medical care including things like pharmaceutical products, mRNA products, etc. It’s for this reason I’ve gravitated towards the social media site “X” which legitimately allows free speech, (if not always “friendly” speech.) On X, people will quickly identify the glaring omission from any study and then you, the reader, can choose to delve in or disregard. It’s like how tv used to be…they’d bring in the smartest person on each side of an issue to debate and then let the viewer decide, as opposed to having a system where every aspect is designed to push a particular perspective.
In a study of 315 kids receiving toxic chemicals because they complain about being the sex they are, supposedly the results show that these chemicals are hugely beneficial to the lives of these kids. However, in addition to all of the other issues with this study (including only 2 year follow-up and dropping several of the 8 characteristics being measured), 2 of the kids committed suicide after receiving these chemicals. What more has to be said?
It seems to me that the criminal absence of interest in following up how transed people are doing is absolutely deliberate. Those who are running this show know what the results will be. They know what the results are. That is exactly why they go to such extremes to ensure no-one is looking. They should all be locked up.
The journals that publish junk science do it to line their pockets with gold. The editors and review panels that approve these publications should all lose their jobs and face shame and punishment. They appointed themselves to be the church of science, but they are fake. They would not know science if it hit them with a baseball bat. Many people who could be helped to have better life are ROBBED by fakers who push sex rejection pills and injections and surgeries, instead of giving them a chance for real healing. The fakers deny their patients any opportunity to be healthy.
If someone tells you that he is Napoleon are you required to agree with him? If you fail to endorse his delusions are you being Napoleonphobic? If he tells you that he needs a gun to defeat Wellington do you allow him to purchase one? It is exactly the same situation if a man tells you that he is a woman. No one can change their biological sex. The mentally ill are entitled to freely live their lives with sympathy and care but not forced acceptance of their fantasies and never should they be allowed to possess deadly weapons. The recent mass murder in Canada is a result of ignoring this reality.
Thanks for an excellent critique of yet another study ‘proving’ GAC is effective. It’s all so sickening—ruining the lives of a legion of young people under the banner of medical science. Sickening too that such studies are reviewed positively by peers and published in ‘reputable’ journals. Sorry, but on behalf of so many broken young people and grief-stricken families: may all involved rot in hell.
Here is some background on 'research roulette.' The first data ever collected on LGBT children came from MA which became an enclave for the cult's agenda. It was called the MA Youth Risk Behavior Survey and was done in 1995. Robert Garofalo, mentioned in this post and the lead the arm of transitioning children at Lurie, was among researchers. Among the info asked is sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI). Does anything SOGI belong near children? The interest in the data is to make more data and grow a population. From there grows industry. The entire thing is a sham.
MA continues to do this study. There is a national one now done by the CDC and yes, it contains SOGI data since 2023. Once they collect data, even if it is based on a bogus concept like gender identity, they have captured a patient population.
You can read about another early and important study to industry here dubbed "Hatred in the Hallways." It basically accuses US schools as being 'hateful' toward LGBT based on little data and bogus concepts that do not belong near children. It is about markets. https://margox.substack.com/p/traumatizing-american-families?r=1kuq0
Great article. Every point about how debating transgender medical care is nearly impossible can also be said about many aspects of medical care including things like pharmaceutical products, mRNA products, etc. It’s for this reason I’ve gravitated towards the social media site “X” which legitimately allows free speech, (if not always “friendly” speech.) On X, people will quickly identify the glaring omission from any study and then you, the reader, can choose to delve in or disregard. It’s like how tv used to be…they’d bring in the smartest person on each side of an issue to debate and then let the viewer decide, as opposed to having a system where every aspect is designed to push a particular perspective.
In a study of 315 kids receiving toxic chemicals because they complain about being the sex they are, supposedly the results show that these chemicals are hugely beneficial to the lives of these kids. However, in addition to all of the other issues with this study (including only 2 year follow-up and dropping several of the 8 characteristics being measured), 2 of the kids committed suicide after receiving these chemicals. What more has to be said?
It seems to me that the criminal absence of interest in following up how transed people are doing is absolutely deliberate. Those who are running this show know what the results will be. They know what the results are. That is exactly why they go to such extremes to ensure no-one is looking. They should all be locked up.
The journals that publish junk science do it to line their pockets with gold. The editors and review panels that approve these publications should all lose their jobs and face shame and punishment. They appointed themselves to be the church of science, but they are fake. They would not know science if it hit them with a baseball bat. Many people who could be helped to have better life are ROBBED by fakers who push sex rejection pills and injections and surgeries, instead of giving them a chance for real healing. The fakers deny their patients any opportunity to be healthy.
If someone tells you that he is Napoleon are you required to agree with him? If you fail to endorse his delusions are you being Napoleonphobic? If he tells you that he needs a gun to defeat Wellington do you allow him to purchase one? It is exactly the same situation if a man tells you that he is a woman. No one can change their biological sex. The mentally ill are entitled to freely live their lives with sympathy and care but not forced acceptance of their fantasies and never should they be allowed to possess deadly weapons. The recent mass murder in Canada is a result of ignoring this reality.
Great critique of this study!
Thanks for an excellent critique of yet another study ‘proving’ GAC is effective. It’s all so sickening—ruining the lives of a legion of young people under the banner of medical science. Sickening too that such studies are reviewed positively by peers and published in ‘reputable’ journals. Sorry, but on behalf of so many broken young people and grief-stricken families: may all involved rot in hell.
Here is some background on 'research roulette.' The first data ever collected on LGBT children came from MA which became an enclave for the cult's agenda. It was called the MA Youth Risk Behavior Survey and was done in 1995. Robert Garofalo, mentioned in this post and the lead the arm of transitioning children at Lurie, was among researchers. Among the info asked is sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI). Does anything SOGI belong near children? The interest in the data is to make more data and grow a population. From there grows industry. The entire thing is a sham.
MA continues to do this study. There is a national one now done by the CDC and yes, it contains SOGI data since 2023. Once they collect data, even if it is based on a bogus concept like gender identity, they have captured a patient population.
You can read about another early and important study to industry here dubbed "Hatred in the Hallways." It basically accuses US schools as being 'hateful' toward LGBT based on little data and bogus concepts that do not belong near children. It is about markets. https://margox.substack.com/p/traumatizing-american-families?r=1kuq0