Saturday PITT Review - August 26 to 30, 2024
Saturday PITT Review - August 26 to 30, 2024
August 31, 2024
Welcome to the PITT weekly roundup where you find a list of the week’s postings along with links to some of our favorite books, videos, social media, and podcasts. Please continue the fight against the harms of gender ideology by sharing.
Access to all PITT content is free. Our objective is to inform the public of the devastating impact of gender ideology on families through our personal experiences. And it’s working - support for transitioning of children and distressed young adults is crumbling due to evidence-based findings.
Quote of the Week from Comments Section: “My child is not your experiment and is certainly not validation for your pop psychology.”
PITT POSTS THIS WEEK:
Friday, August 30: Corrected for Accuracy
Thursday, August 29: Comments Section
Wednesday, August 28: Additional Factors that Might Contribute to Gender Dysphoria
Tuesday, August 27: AMA: More Harm Please!
Monday, August 26: Gender-affirming care model
IN THE NEWS
Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle wins discrimination case after being banned from women-only app
I often feel guilty when some particular form of American insanity is exported to the rest of the world. The rise of anorexia in Japan is a case in point. As is gender ideology. Douglas Murray does a brilliant exegesis on this in his Madness of Crowds. I thought the Canadians might have one upped us with the devotion of some in power to trans ideology. But for sheer madness we have to look to Australia and I mean that as a compliment.
A man brought a suit against a social app for women that excluded him because he is not a women. Sall Grover, the CEO for the app, Giggle for Girls, told the court that she would not address this man as “Ms” and that, even if a transgender woman presented as female, had gender affirmation surgery, lived as a female and held female identity documents, Grover would still see him as a “biological male”. Meanwhile the justice claimed prior cases, going back over 30 year, “established that on its ordinary meaning sex is changeable”. You can’t make this stuff up. And it’s not over. Grover plans to appeal. What’s at stake is whether validating a man is given legal precedent over women’s rights to privacy, dignity, assembly and safety. It may be good for woman around the world that this is addressed head-on in the courts.
WHAT WE’RE WATCHING
IMAGE THAT CAPTURES IT
GET OUR BOOK
Parents with Inconvenient Truths about Trans: Tales from the Home Front in the Fight to Save Our Kids, a compendium of some of the most compelling essays yet from PITT.
SHARE YOUR STORY
Have a story to share about gender ideology? Submit to Pitt@genspect.org
Thank you for the link.
I watched the interview- very, very well done.
THIS IS INCREDIBLE.
I was aware of her case, was interested because after researching to keep my child out of the cult, I'm still here reading.
What I hadn't realised is that THIS CASE IS HUGE.
What this incredibly brave and determined woman is doing, is fighting this fight for all of us.
She didn't have any idea what was going on in this realm, until an angry and controlling harasser decided to target her and her business.
I hadn't realised- this is the first integral case that will be instrumental in guiding policy and law regarding men adopting 'womanhood'/(? Female status? Woman status?) and entering ANYTHING that is for women.
Yes- in Australia- but the repercussions are international, because it brings the legalities under UN international law regarding rights for women into question.
This is SO important.
I've funded her. This woman is fighting for me and my children.
“Sex is changeable” - didn’t the trans activist line used to be that sex is different from gender? Hence why “transsexual” went out of fashion and “transgender” became the preferred term?
If sex was changeable, my husband and I would both change sex for 9+ months so I could get him pregnant and we could have another baby. Alas.