Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Megan Baker's avatar

I've read some good things from PITT, but this wasn't one of them. This woman incorporates some kernels of wisdom into manipulative chats with her children. Yes, question authority, by all means! But let your kids come to their own conclusions about the meaning of events around them, and don't teach them that social workers who might approach them take children away from families (talk about making kids neurotic!). Social workers DO take kids away from families, but not from white middle-class parents. In fact, a kid of that demographic is unlikely to ever MEET a social worker until he or she reaches adulthood, so why scare such a kid for no reason? It's necessary for kids to go to the park by themselves or with friends after age 5 or 6, so they shouldn't lie if they were to encounter resistance to their being there. Tell the truth: my mom knows I'm here; I'm not a fragile moron; and you should mind your own business. This piece felt icky to me.

Expand full comment
Brian Villanueva's avatar

We've used the same analogy with our kids for years: "If I go to the doctor and say 'doc, I'm a dragon', what should the appropriate response be: "gee, why do you think you're a dragon?" or "great, let's get you scheduled for a tail graft and there's a flamethrower implant current in clinical trials'. " We started that analogy about 10 years ago. It works because it highlights that gender ideology isn't really about sex or gender at all; it's about whether reality exists.

"She seemed to get that. But she still wants to be “nice.”"

I was listening to a report on the girls that are suing their sorority for breach of contract for admitting a man (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kappa-kappa-gamma-sorority-lawsuit-block-transgender-woman-dismisses-university-of-wyoming/ ). Sororities are free associations, so part of me wants to say, "well girls, you voted this dude in so you could virtue signal, so screw your discomfort with him watching you shower." However... there are real differences between men and women, and one of the largest psychological differences has to do with conflict response.

It makes so much sense that the author's daughter would say she "just wants to be nice". Women are significantly more averse to conflict than men (whether that difference is genetic or cultural is above my pay grade -- that it exists is self-evident and scientifically very robust). Which means ggender ideology is a case where we men need to be willing to use our greater willingness to engage in conflict on behalf of women. I respect that's not popular today (even with many women) in our era of equal rights and social androgyny, but its lack of popularity doesn't obviate its necessity.

Women and girls shouldn't have to drive this fight. It's our job as men. Why? Because as I said above, gender ideology isn't just an assault on womanhood but on reality itself. And that makes it assault on everyone... and that makes it our job. Men today are brawn and brain (jocks and nerds) with nothing connecting them, nothing to harness the brawn to the service of the brain. As C.S. Lewis would say, it's high time for us men to rediscover our chests -- and I don't mean for "chestfeeding".

Expand full comment
168 more comments...

No posts