Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dee's avatar

Thanks for this article! You make a lot of great points. I did have one comment - I think it can be dangerous (and inaccurate) to make a distinction between “true” transgender people and the latest cohort of young people. This kind of thinking keeps young people trapped and determined to prove they weren’t just “faking it for attention”. And unless there is some measurable diagnostic criteria (such as the discovery that a person is chromosomally a different sex than their anatomy indicated) it’s still just nonsense based on feelings. What I DO think is reasonable to say is that there are a small number of people whose distress around their physical sex is so persistent, intense, and unresolveable that the best choice for them may be to transition and present as the opposite sex (with or without medical transition). This should be undertaken only after exhausting other options to help a person accept themselves as they are, which should always be the preferred outcome. And of course these people deserve to live in safety and dignity, and not face harassment or discrimination.

Expand full comment
GenderRealistMom's avatar

I sort of think that if anything transracial makes a bit more sense than transgender. Unlike sex, race is not binary or clearly defined. If we go back enough , most of us are a mix of races. It is possible that Rachel Dolezal had a Black ancestor several generations ago and is in part Black, even if she and her parents don't know that. It is absolutely impossible to be part man-part woman or to be the opposite sex than the one you were born. Of course, you can't change your race either but if the premises is that you are a different race , you do have slightly more leg to stand on than saying you are a different sex.

Expand full comment
94 more comments...

No posts