It seems like the groundwork was laid for this by the glorification of girls and women with huge false breasts, initially normalized by publications like Playboy. Breast ‘augmentation’ is brutal, dangerous and ruins natural sensation, as well as natural function.
Yet, these awful repercussions are not required to be advertised as caveats …
It seems like the groundwork was laid for this by the glorification of girls and women with huge false breasts, initially normalized by publications like Playboy. Breast ‘augmentation’ is brutal, dangerous and ruins natural sensation, as well as natural function.
Yet, these awful repercussions are not required to be advertised as caveats in ads promoting this surgery, as cigarettes must have.
Social pressure to adhere to unattainable and unnatural beauty standards leads women now to not only subject themselves to this, but also to pay for it. Even the advent of supposedly body positive acceptance of curvier figures (instead of just curvy boobs on a stick thin frame) has led to butt implant popularity as well!
The social acceptance of these plastic surgery adaptations in the absence of a medically necessary mastectomy or grievous accident has led to the growth of an unnecessary and bloated plastic surgery industry that doesn’t value health at all, yet is allowed to be considered a part of the medical profession.
How natural is it for them to glom onto any justification to profit over mutilation of healthy flesh? After all, isn’t the entire industry of advertising itself based on convincing people they are unhappy or inadequate and will be made whole by purchasing more useless crap?
Government regulations against the legality of convincing people that their healthy bodies are inadequate to sell mutilation surgeries is one of the few aspects of government regulation that makes sense, as would be a return to healthcare companies being required to be nonprofits.
And speaking of large breasts, look no further than 2023, when this perverted man with a fetish was permitted to carry on teaching in Ontario, Canada. Unbelievable.
I'm glad someone else has noticed that all this seems to have its roots in other forms of plastic surgery that have been normalized for many years. And for years-much longer than gender identity has been a buzzword-it has been perfectly legal, and not terribly uncommon, for children and teens to have all sorts of surgeries that damage their bodies and bring all sorts of risks, for solely cosmetic purposes, with parental consent. The same as the current standard for "top surgery" for gender affirmation.
I can't understand why there isn't the same level of outage over an industry that allows young people to have their bones broken and reshaped, their breasts enlarged or reduced for cosmetic purposes with many of the same risks of gender affirming breast surgery, paralyzing toxins injected into facial areas they don't like, etc etc etc.
When society has for years given the green light to any child who wants any sort of body modification, so long as one parent consents, why are we so surprised that yet another form has taken hold, with extreme ideology behind it? Why are we so quiet about teens feeling the need to significantly enlarge their breasts surgically to meet a stereotyped and unrealistic sexual ideal, and about an entire surgical specialty dedicated to major surgeries so that they can do so, alongside adult women? Why would any child see the Kardashians, and NOT have a cavalier attitude towards all manner of body modification procedures for cosmetic purposes, beginning at a young age?
It seems like the groundwork was laid for this by the glorification of girls and women with huge false breasts, initially normalized by publications like Playboy. Breast ‘augmentation’ is brutal, dangerous and ruins natural sensation, as well as natural function.
Yet, these awful repercussions are not required to be advertised as caveats in ads promoting this surgery, as cigarettes must have.
Social pressure to adhere to unattainable and unnatural beauty standards leads women now to not only subject themselves to this, but also to pay for it. Even the advent of supposedly body positive acceptance of curvier figures (instead of just curvy boobs on a stick thin frame) has led to butt implant popularity as well!
The social acceptance of these plastic surgery adaptations in the absence of a medically necessary mastectomy or grievous accident has led to the growth of an unnecessary and bloated plastic surgery industry that doesn’t value health at all, yet is allowed to be considered a part of the medical profession.
How natural is it for them to glom onto any justification to profit over mutilation of healthy flesh? After all, isn’t the entire industry of advertising itself based on convincing people they are unhappy or inadequate and will be made whole by purchasing more useless crap?
Government regulations against the legality of convincing people that their healthy bodies are inadequate to sell mutilation surgeries is one of the few aspects of government regulation that makes sense, as would be a return to healthcare companies being required to be nonprofits.
And speaking of large breasts, look no further than 2023, when this perverted man with a fetish was permitted to carry on teaching in Ontario, Canada. Unbelievable.
https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/teacher-at-centre-of-dress-code-controversy-no-longer-working-at-oakville-school-1.6296336
I'm glad someone else has noticed that all this seems to have its roots in other forms of plastic surgery that have been normalized for many years. And for years-much longer than gender identity has been a buzzword-it has been perfectly legal, and not terribly uncommon, for children and teens to have all sorts of surgeries that damage their bodies and bring all sorts of risks, for solely cosmetic purposes, with parental consent. The same as the current standard for "top surgery" for gender affirmation.
I can't understand why there isn't the same level of outage over an industry that allows young people to have their bones broken and reshaped, their breasts enlarged or reduced for cosmetic purposes with many of the same risks of gender affirming breast surgery, paralyzing toxins injected into facial areas they don't like, etc etc etc.
When society has for years given the green light to any child who wants any sort of body modification, so long as one parent consents, why are we so surprised that yet another form has taken hold, with extreme ideology behind it? Why are we so quiet about teens feeling the need to significantly enlarge their breasts surgically to meet a stereotyped and unrealistic sexual ideal, and about an entire surgical specialty dedicated to major surgeries so that they can do so, alongside adult women? Why would any child see the Kardashians, and NOT have a cavalier attitude towards all manner of body modification procedures for cosmetic purposes, beginning at a young age?