Well I've researched the topic and I can say Laura Aboli absolutely nails it in her speech.
The term 'conspiracy theory' is no different to 'transphobe' in that it's designed to halt discussion, open minded enquiry and free thought by imposing a social stigma on these things.
In any case, the transhumanist movement is completely out in the…
Well I've researched the topic and I can say Laura Aboli absolutely nails it in her speech.
The term 'conspiracy theory' is no different to 'transphobe' in that it's designed to halt discussion, open minded enquiry and free thought by imposing a social stigma on these things.
In any case, the transhumanist movement is completely out in the open and it only relies on the general public being too distracted to notice what is going on. The UK government put out a 50 odd page booklet on their official website a couple of years ago detailing their plans for brain-computer interfaces, implants, nanotech etc and genetic engineering.
As with all of these nefarious agendas, it's vociferously denied and ridiculed as preposterous, while at the same time being implemented right in front of our faces (AKA gaslighting).
The WEF (who have groomed most 'world leaders' through their 'young global leaders' program, and most movers and shakers through their 'global shapers' program) cannot stop talking about it either. Schwab boasts the 4th Industrial Revolution will "change our physical, digital and biological identities" and that we won't be human when we emerge from it.
In truth there is no 'gender ideology' and no 'political correctness' and no 'wokeness'..... these are all smokescreens and intellectual quagmires to stop the masses comprehending what is actually a very cold, calculated and pragmatic agenda to de-gender the masses (and our culture) and create a population of genderless, sterilised grey worker drones (but covered in rainbow stickers, fluorescent hair dye and glitter and with a pseudo gender of their choice).
With artificial wombs a decade away and AI 'education' on the horizon the ruling class simply have no need for a gender, pair bonding, parenting, families or natural reproduction.
What they want for humanity is no more 'conspiratorial' than the changes we've seen in farming over the past 50+ years. Cows don't need convincing which is why farmers don't bother to invent 'progressive ideologies' to rationalise the changes they are making to farming practices.
The truth is it's just more convenient and profitable for Big Agra to factory farm cows ...... and the same pragmatic and boring reasoning applies to managing the human herd too. If you're a technocrat you obviously want an atomised, weak, confused, dependent population.... not a population of loving families with a strong cohesive culture and sense of community and tradition.
If we want to remain human and maintain something vaguely resembling a high civilisation we have to be as pragmatic as the ruling class (but in the opposite direction). That means ditching smartphones and all wireless gadgets, feminist ideology, the TV, Hollywood, state schooling and higher education and Big Pharma drugs... and bringing back stay-at-home mothers (or fathers if that suits a couple better) and home schooling as the default.
Simply analysing 'woke ideology' and engaging in endless intellectual hand wringing (or soul searching) - or ranting at school boards - is going to achieve absolutely nothing in terms of stopping the transhuman agenda.
For the first time in 5000 years of technological progress, if we are going to achieve more progress (or just maintain our current level of civilisation), we are going to have to start REJECTING new technologies just as often as we embrace them ... and reject them with a passion! :)
We should thank Schwab and his cronies for dangling their digital sword of transhumanism above our heads. Our humanity and connection to nature and the divine is no longer a given. It must be desired and actively embraced, or it WILL be erased and replaced by a technological (artificial) substitute.
Well, maybe if you'd ditched your smartphone and wireless gadgets you wouldn't have "done your research" and fallen down this particular rabbit hole. Laura Aboli is no scientist or researcher of any kind, and no authority on the subject. She's a public speaker and entrepreneur. And she wears fake eyelashes. Makes her look like a doe, but that's her business.
"Well, maybe if you'd ditched your smartphone and wireless gadgets you wouldn't have "done your research" and fallen down this particular rabbit hole"
That's a very weak argument. As I explained the transhuman agenda is completely out in the open. In fact it is being enthusiastically promoted. It is being normalised.
Dismissing it out of hand for being a 'rabbit hole' is just an admission that you don't want to think beyond the surface. My point was that surface level thinking makes us incapable of comprehending - let alone resisting - such agendas.
Surface level thinking on 'trans' issues is when people say "everyone has a right to free expression and we should support them by affirming their identity and not being such a nasty transphobe". For surface level thinkers, anything more nuanced and complex than that is regarded as a 'rabbit hole' and dismissed.
FYI I don't use a smartphone or any wireless gadgets and it's perfectly possible to use the internet without frying your brain, and killing all the insects and birds. Just use an ethernet cable (it's faster and more secure too).
Wifi is already being removed from schools in many countries (and even outlawed) because it's making the kids sick and unable to concentrate. FWIW I think it is also a contributing factor in ROGD, given that microwaves are known to cause anxiety, depression, mood swings, anhedonia and a general feeling of 'wrongness'. Throw in teenage angst, the disembodiment of online 'socialising' and the transhumanist agenda and you have the prefect recipe for a trans identity.
" Laura Aboli is no scientist or researcher of any kind, and no authority on the subject. "
The 'argument from authority' is a logical fallacy. In any case it makes no sense to put 'authority' on a pedestal when trans medicalisation is being affirmed by the sme authority figures (politicians, doctors, scientists, teachers etc).
The fact that Laura Aboli is not a scientist means she can speak the truth on trans issues without having her funding pulled and her career destroyed.
The fact that she enhances her female features to make herself more attractive makes her a normal woman. I agree that the arms race in eyelashes (and makeup generally) is getting a little out of hand, but it's harmless compared to the trend for tattoos, piercings, fluorescent hair, high cut leotards, and transhumanist outfits and accessories that have become the standard uniform for all the pop stars and celebs (and teachers) who influence our children.
Well I've researched the topic and I can say Laura Aboli absolutely nails it in her speech.
The term 'conspiracy theory' is no different to 'transphobe' in that it's designed to halt discussion, open minded enquiry and free thought by imposing a social stigma on these things.
In any case, the transhumanist movement is completely out in the open and it only relies on the general public being too distracted to notice what is going on. The UK government put out a 50 odd page booklet on their official website a couple of years ago detailing their plans for brain-computer interfaces, implants, nanotech etc and genetic engineering.
As with all of these nefarious agendas, it's vociferously denied and ridiculed as preposterous, while at the same time being implemented right in front of our faces (AKA gaslighting).
The WEF (who have groomed most 'world leaders' through their 'young global leaders' program, and most movers and shakers through their 'global shapers' program) cannot stop talking about it either. Schwab boasts the 4th Industrial Revolution will "change our physical, digital and biological identities" and that we won't be human when we emerge from it.
In truth there is no 'gender ideology' and no 'political correctness' and no 'wokeness'..... these are all smokescreens and intellectual quagmires to stop the masses comprehending what is actually a very cold, calculated and pragmatic agenda to de-gender the masses (and our culture) and create a population of genderless, sterilised grey worker drones (but covered in rainbow stickers, fluorescent hair dye and glitter and with a pseudo gender of their choice).
With artificial wombs a decade away and AI 'education' on the horizon the ruling class simply have no need for a gender, pair bonding, parenting, families or natural reproduction.
What they want for humanity is no more 'conspiratorial' than the changes we've seen in farming over the past 50+ years. Cows don't need convincing which is why farmers don't bother to invent 'progressive ideologies' to rationalise the changes they are making to farming practices.
The truth is it's just more convenient and profitable for Big Agra to factory farm cows ...... and the same pragmatic and boring reasoning applies to managing the human herd too. If you're a technocrat you obviously want an atomised, weak, confused, dependent population.... not a population of loving families with a strong cohesive culture and sense of community and tradition.
If we want to remain human and maintain something vaguely resembling a high civilisation we have to be as pragmatic as the ruling class (but in the opposite direction). That means ditching smartphones and all wireless gadgets, feminist ideology, the TV, Hollywood, state schooling and higher education and Big Pharma drugs... and bringing back stay-at-home mothers (or fathers if that suits a couple better) and home schooling as the default.
Simply analysing 'woke ideology' and engaging in endless intellectual hand wringing (or soul searching) - or ranting at school boards - is going to achieve absolutely nothing in terms of stopping the transhuman agenda.
For the first time in 5000 years of technological progress, if we are going to achieve more progress (or just maintain our current level of civilisation), we are going to have to start REJECTING new technologies just as often as we embrace them ... and reject them with a passion! :)
We should thank Schwab and his cronies for dangling their digital sword of transhumanism above our heads. Our humanity and connection to nature and the divine is no longer a given. It must be desired and actively embraced, or it WILL be erased and replaced by a technological (artificial) substitute.
Well, maybe if you'd ditched your smartphone and wireless gadgets you wouldn't have "done your research" and fallen down this particular rabbit hole. Laura Aboli is no scientist or researcher of any kind, and no authority on the subject. She's a public speaker and entrepreneur. And she wears fake eyelashes. Makes her look like a doe, but that's her business.
"Well, maybe if you'd ditched your smartphone and wireless gadgets you wouldn't have "done your research" and fallen down this particular rabbit hole"
That's a very weak argument. As I explained the transhuman agenda is completely out in the open. In fact it is being enthusiastically promoted. It is being normalised.
Dismissing it out of hand for being a 'rabbit hole' is just an admission that you don't want to think beyond the surface. My point was that surface level thinking makes us incapable of comprehending - let alone resisting - such agendas.
Surface level thinking on 'trans' issues is when people say "everyone has a right to free expression and we should support them by affirming their identity and not being such a nasty transphobe". For surface level thinkers, anything more nuanced and complex than that is regarded as a 'rabbit hole' and dismissed.
FYI I don't use a smartphone or any wireless gadgets and it's perfectly possible to use the internet without frying your brain, and killing all the insects and birds. Just use an ethernet cable (it's faster and more secure too).
Wifi is already being removed from schools in many countries (and even outlawed) because it's making the kids sick and unable to concentrate. FWIW I think it is also a contributing factor in ROGD, given that microwaves are known to cause anxiety, depression, mood swings, anhedonia and a general feeling of 'wrongness'. Throw in teenage angst, the disembodiment of online 'socialising' and the transhumanist agenda and you have the prefect recipe for a trans identity.
" Laura Aboli is no scientist or researcher of any kind, and no authority on the subject. "
The 'argument from authority' is a logical fallacy. In any case it makes no sense to put 'authority' on a pedestal when trans medicalisation is being affirmed by the sme authority figures (politicians, doctors, scientists, teachers etc).
The fact that Laura Aboli is not a scientist means she can speak the truth on trans issues without having her funding pulled and her career destroyed.
The fact that she enhances her female features to make herself more attractive makes her a normal woman. I agree that the arms race in eyelashes (and makeup generally) is getting a little out of hand, but it's harmless compared to the trend for tattoos, piercings, fluorescent hair, high cut leotards, and transhumanist outfits and accessories that have become the standard uniform for all the pop stars and celebs (and teachers) who influence our children.
Well, you've definitely convinced me. Anyone with false eyelashes obviously couldn't know what they're talking about.