32 Comments

One of the things I found surprising on the WPATH site commentary on studies that showed 75% ish of trans women completely loose their libido on hormones and 80%ish loose their libido after an orchiectomy. Is anyone told this before they go down this path? They will need to take viagra before sex, even previously healthy 20-30 year olds!

Expand full comment

This is an outstanding piece of reasoning. Please let us know if WPATH have any response.

Expand full comment

Please do this. Put into your search line, Howard Stern Buck Angel dildo Then ask why does this woman pornographer have an affiliation with cautionary organizations? Ask. If you feel you can't ask here, go to uteheggengrasswidow.wordpress.com

Expand full comment

excellent letter

Expand full comment

By the way, this Princeton student, Matthew Wilson, is excellent. He must have taken Abigail Shrier's talk to heart:

https://www.jamesgmartin.center/2022/01/from-hiring-to-admissions-universities-seek-ideological-conformity-in-applicants/

One paragraph:

Under “Gender Non-Specific Pronouns,” UNC’s DEI office explicitly promotes gender ideology, explaining that “Asking and correctly using someone’s pronouns is one of the most basic ways to show your respect for their individuality and gender identity” and describing terms like “Ze/Hir/Hirs,” “Xe/Xem/Xyrs,” and “Ze/Zir/Zirs” as “commonly used pronouns.”

Expand full comment

IMO Abigail Shrier is a genus. The older generations running our institutions are worse than useless. The young are going to move obsolete journalism aside and shake our institutions back to sanity. Thank you, Mr. Wilson. "The Emperor has no clothes." So "1984" to say that these nonsense words are "commonly used pronouns". Maybe Peggy Noonan, for instance, could discuss this instead of talking about a bygone era and fantasizing about Brandon being courteous while GI harms our young. I once read the NYT every day and respected teacher's unions :-0 I am ashamed of our universities right now.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this excellent essay. Maybe it could be published as an open letter to WPATH and to the California (and other) Teacher's Union with an ask to desist in grooming, diagnosing and affirming their students - as Nomomomo suggests.

I am not sure what paper would have the courage to print it. Maybe the Washington Examiner or the New York Post?

Am am so sorry your teen daughter has been hurt.

Expand full comment

The Wall Street Journal?

Expand full comment

That would be fantastic if they would. They publish Abigail Shier but have been pretty lame on this issue otherwise.

Expand full comment

I knew about Shrier, but I was unaware that they've since dropped the ball. Too bad.

Expand full comment

Well, I feel they've missed the chance to do more and I recall a story on the news side celebrating a middle aged AGP CEO and how all the people who reported to him (and were paid by him) came around and thought it was so great! I was disappointed that it was all rah rah and no "other side" reported. However, I should stop being negative. Maybe they would print it :) !

Expand full comment

It's ease to become cynical and disillusioned. People and institutions you never expected to succumb are suddenly captured. This idea pathogen is more transmissible than covid.

Expand full comment

Yes. It is. And the institutions include ones you trusted with the most precious thing you have: your daughter.

Expand full comment

Excellent! Thank you.

Do you all think its outside out WPATH's authority to issue a separate statement to public schools asking them to desist in grooming, diagnosing and affirming their students? I wish they would.

Expand full comment

This is an awesome essay. I think you should submit it for publication in other venues. More people need to read this. Perhaps you would like to send it to members of Congress and to the White House administration. You write very persuasively. ... I've tried to write up my comments on the proposed standards & each time find myself overcome with emotion. What you've accomplished is very important and needs to be read more widely.

Expand full comment

I really like the idea of sending your wonderful essay to each member of Congress and to the White House administration. It will mostly be ignored but someone might take it up... if only because they will see backlash coming.

Expand full comment

I wish the affirmation harpies would read this...

Expand full comment

Utterly spot-on, which makes it scathing because the SOC findings and recommendations are so astonishingly bankrupt. Most impressive is your ability to remain focused and measured, even as your child is being hurt. You speak for a multitude, and you have put WPATH on notice. Many thanks.

Expand full comment

What a brilliant piece of work! We can only hope that WPATH gives it more than a passing glance, if for no other reason than to take seriously the tsunami of lawsuits soon to be looming on the horizon based on its irrefutable evidence and logic. You could present this in a court of law as an amicus brief. Maybe one day you'll have the chance to do just that.

By the way, thank you for the following quote. It's not usually included as part of the argument, but it is central to it, and it needs to be repeated until the culture regains its sanity:

"We also have to balance the rights of transgender people against the rights of natal women. Balancing transgender and natal women’s rights should not be an oppression competition. We need to look for practical compromises and solutions that acknowledge both group’s needs/rights."

I hope this piece will be circulated widely. People unaware of the issue will be shocked and horrified by what you so clearly describe, and when it reaches politicians and clinicians it will have a powerful impact. Perhaps other Substacks with larger readerships (e.g., Bari Weiss and Abigail Shrier) might reprint it, as well as media outlets and scientists' blogs, for example. Quillette also should be interested in this...they do great work on this topic and this is 100% up to their journalistic standards.

Expand full comment

Keep in mind that the context, historically, of the trans movement, are the early statements from a transsexual on the BBC program exploiting this exotic new species, "We are all intersex" and "all heterosexual sex is a desire to be trans". Everyone ignored the nonsense, because "it was so rare". Actually it was just not safe to do all those surgeries, because anesthesia hadn't progressed to allow the lengthy medically unnecessary time under, and we didn't have opioids to get thru the pain after. It's all about marketing the drugs. The question is, how can we make it cool to be natural about sex, preserving childhood? I have some ideas, as an early childhood specialist. You are all welcome to visit my blog, uteheggengrasswidow.wordpress.com I will be posting with ideas on how to keep the detransition going when it starts. Good luck to you all. Ute

Expand full comment

There is a fair amount known about puberty blockers on the male brain. They suppress sexual desire. I'm sure that's going to help young boys get a better understanding of their bodies. Sure it will.

And yes, the same drugs are used for chemical castration, so yes, fertility is "affected" for those considering MTF. There is ignorance as to whether infertility is permanent, if the young person finds that this was the wrong path for them. (No one knows how many of those there are, either.)

Full speed ahead.... because......?

Expand full comment

"Feminists" have wanted to castrate young men for years.

Now's their chance?

Expand full comment

This was brilliant. So well done. I am so impressed. Really great insights. I will be sharing widely.

Expand full comment

It's unclear why these interventions are being made available outside clinical studies with careful oversight, given the lack of understanding of outcomes, trajectories of gender dysphoria with therapy, time, psychiatric support and/or medicalization, and the seriousness of the medical effects (sterilization, bone, heart, brain, endocrine).

See Clayton in Medscape:

"Why are these experimental interventions, with inherent risks and scarce, low-quality evidence for benefits, being implemented outside HREC-regulated clinical trial settings?'"

Expand full comment

I just wrote to Medscape, asking why they are not commissioning studies on the mental health issues in the rest of the family, when there is a "trans diagnosis". The pressure not to report is clear in the pressure applied to the 60 Minutes program, which was supposed to be a full program on detransitioners but CBS collapsed it to 20 minutes under pressure and Leslie Stahl had to publish a follow up interview with opposing views. Most transsexuals regret their choices at one point or another. I know--my ex husband blamed me for divorcing him, and said it was my "rejection" which caused him to go for the surgery. I post about all things related to recovering from a "diagnosis' In the family at

uteheggengrasswidow.wordpress.com Feel free to check it out and comment. I moderate. No haters.

Expand full comment

Yes - you took the time and trouble to point out the illogic, inconsistency, and absurdity of many of WPATH's "guidelines" in a clear and concise manner, with the appropriate - and I'm sure very restrained - amount of outrage. Great job, and please do share with WPATH.

Expand full comment